Thursday, January 31, 2019

The warming Arctic, unstable polar vortices, and cold waves



So, all the “proles” are going to say that the elites are breaching common sense and refuse to believe the theories on climate change, and the calls for some political measures now.

But a warming Arctic may nudge the “polar vortex” south more often.

Kelly Levin of the World Resources Institute explains here.  

It’s also true that in the distant past, winter cold spells were even more extreme.  If you check the World Book Encyclopedia from 1950, which my family had (and which I kept – those great covered relief maps of the states) many northern and midwestern states have very extreme record lows which have not been approached in my lifetime.

  
And we’ve never had a blizzard quite like New York’s in March 1888, although the second (February) blizzard of 1978 when I was living in Manhattan came close.  World Weather Attribution indicates that severe winter weather is actually less common than it used to be. 

Wednesday, January 30, 2019

Immigration detainees "volunteer" to work for practically nothing


Victoria Law has a big op-ed in the New York Times about the “voluntary” labor of immigrants in detention centers as exploited by private contractors, link here
  
Apparently the pay is pennies an hour.
  
Detention of immigrants who entered unlawfully but who may be processing asylum claims is viewed as civil, not criminal.  So it is rather shocking that Congress allow this.
  
  
Detention centers exist all over the country, not just at the border.  There is one in Farmville VA, another near Berlin MD on the eastern shore;  there are several in Pennsylvania.
   
CNN has a news report on a center in Virginia for detained unaccompanied minors.

Monday, January 28, 2019

A note about populist conservatism from Prager U; did the Covington students "intend" to make others "uncomfortable"?



I’ll put this video on the “issues blog” this time.

Stephen Harper explains “Why Trump Won” for Prager U.
  

He explains that people who live “everywhere” and are numerous are still fewer than people who live “somewhere”, are much more tribal or family-centered and much less immune to the policy dislocations caused by other.  The globalists believe they are anti-tribal and anti-identarian, as if intersectionality were beneath them. 
      
He describes what he calls “populist conservatism” which is more pragmatic than libertarianism and even perhaps Reagan-style conservatism and supply-side economics.
  
What he doesn’t explain is the slide into identarianism even by the “progressives” in the tech community, leading to new forms of censorship.


I’ll link to an opinion piece by Jonathan Capehart, “Time to take on the Covington ‘smirk’”, link     I certain agree with Capehart that the position both Sandmann and Phillips found themselves in was, well, absurd.  But I don’t think Sandmann owed the world or Phillips deference to intersectional ideas about past injustices to groups.  Sandmann’s strategy could be understood as simply a way to defuse a possibly volatile situation, as it (apart from external racial or cultural contexts) would be normally healthful and mature way to react – stand still and do nothing. Capehart has a similar op-ed that “nothing justified what the Covington students did.”  It is certainly reasonable to note the paradox in the Catholic school's sending students to march for the Church position on abortion -- when in practice "the right to life" applies to many more people than the unborn. 

Monica Hesse has an interesting perspective, “The Covington Students and the art of making people uncomfortable”, that is more double edged.  This is the “Rorschach test” where everyone sees in the Sandmann-Phillips “summit meeting” what they are predisposed to see based on past experiences within their own groups.  This was an issue when I was at NIH in 1962.



Update: Feb 4 

Attorneys from an Atlanta law firm have sent warning letters, to retain documents, to at least 50 parties related to Sandman.  Some of the parties do not appear to have said anything negative about him (like David Brooks).  The PDF of the letter is embedded in this Red State article

Saturday, January 26, 2019

Pelosi beats Trump in this first game of thrones as Trump opens government for three weeks





Okay, Trump caved in, after near breakdown at east coast airports on Friday. That’s how “this ends”.  He’d let the government open for three weeks.  Here’s a typical story from my own email provider.  I’ll put the video on this blog this time rather than the TV Reviews blog, where I had put the past two.
  
Neither Trump, Schumer, nor Pelosi belong in the Washington Nationals’s starting rotation this season!


Trump went on a long time about specific processes that he thinks happen around the border. 
  
A bipartisan committee is supposed to work out a compromise that would be likely to provide some wall or fence construction in some specific areas.  There would like be some homes and land taken near the Rio Grande river, in Texas especially, under eminent domain.  That’s likely to come up in the discussions.

It is still unclear whether Trump could get funds for a wall after Feb. 15, if he did not get “his wall” to appease Ann Coulter and Rush Limbaugh and his base, without a national emergency declaration.

The real threat would be that any national emergency that was “valid” would involve other threats that could involve compromising Internet express and access. See “Books” and the story on the Atlantic article, Jan. 12.
  
Furthermore, failing to pay certain employees could have increased the likelihood of a real terror threat that could have led to a “genuine” national emergency. See Jan 22 post.  

Friday, January 25, 2019

Still a lot of identarian racial resentment over Covington keeps getting published (Nation)



The anger returns, in this article in “The Nation” by Elie Mystal. “Black children don’t have Nick Sandmann’s rights.”  The subtitle is “And they definitely don’t get chance to redeem themselves on national TV with the help of Savannah Guthrie” on the NBC Today show.

Later he offers the metaphor, “MAGA eagles peck at our livers all day”, and it does seem that the red MAGA hats, connected to Trump, are part of what made this event incendiary.  He also says that Sandmann was blocking Nathan Phillips’s access to the Lincoln Memorial steps, but the current narrative is that both parties were trying to get the situation to calm down. He also makes a bizarre reference to the George Zimmerman incident in Florida in 2013.
  
 In the video below, Phillips is more critical of Sandmann's behavior than I had thought. But he does admit that the four "Black Israelites" had inflamed the situation.  


Obama’s presidency certain gave a lot of us the illusion that racism was over.  Even more encouraging was the idea of Oprah running some today.  But instead we see a three-way split of grievances:  the urban elites (all races and all sexuality or gender orientations) in the middle, and lower income rural whites on one side, and both urban and rural low income POC (including some undocumented immigrants) on the other.  The two extremes fight each other.  It does seem that the “Russian” algorithmic campaign in social media fed this breakup among lower income people, whom the Democratic Party should have unified in 2016 but didn’t.  I do think that Hillary Clinton let this fall apart. She didn’t take the resentment seriously enough.  Sanders, at least did.  Tim Pool, for all his criticism of the Left now, says he would support Sanders now. 
  
Maybe the new political split isn’t traditional parties, but identarian v. non-identarian.  Most of the charismatic YouTube personalities right now (including LGBT, Ubanell for example) are non-identarian.  I do remember back in the 1990s a couple of conversations in the workplace over some litigation that sounded shockingly identarian to me and nonsensical from the viewpoint of more customary workplace teamwork values.  

Facebook video had a brief film on white privilege today (Tamika Mallory). 

Wednesday, January 23, 2019

A Congressional Commission prepares interim report on Selective Service, national service.



The National Commission on Military, National and Public Service (“Strengthening American democracy through service”) released an interim report today.

Here is the Executive Summary, which is interesting.   Americans were receptive to the idea of coordinated national service, but many are not aware of Selective Service Registration requirements.

The Summary has a socially compelling definition of the concept of "service", Jimmy Carter style. Tim Pool, below, points out toward the end of his video that the commission seems to lean in the direction of an unofficial expectation of some kind of service during young adulthood (possibly in retirement), making the non-server as the "odd man out".  Service means mandatory socialization. 

The commission will consider both requiring women to register, and with abolishing the registration requirement altogether. Many do not know that the registration for transgender persons is based only on birth biological sex.   On the other hand, they will consider carrots for national service.

People were interviewed based on data from several specialized Census surveys.  NPR has a story on the report now.  Smerconsih ran a survey for CNN about service for young Americans and it registered at 68% yes.

  What if if were required for Social Security?  Access?  Opportunity?  Obligation?  The Report says 71% of people 17-24 don't qualify for military service.  (Did that include women?)  Tattoos were one of the reasons!  Another question concerned the quality of civics education. 
      
There will be more discussion of this matter soon.

Tuesday, January 22, 2019

Could Trump's shutdown be intended to undermine FBI and justify a "real" national security declaration for power seizure later? MSNBC warns of this idea



Rachel Maddow has a major video this morning noting how the shutdown can endanger national security.  The video is not embeddable. 
  
Maddow suggests that a shutdown could be politically motivated to hamper the FBI.  She then discusses how FBI security clearances work.  The same considerations seem to apply to DHS.  This seems to invite the risk of future terror incidents, which would then justify a real national security emergency with draconian powers.


She suggests that a shutdown can put the personal security clearances, through financial strains, on law enforcement personnel, for life.
  
Visitors should be aware that serious questions have surfaced on how much real physical evidence will come forth on Buzzfeed’s recent story connecting Trump to possible obstruction of justice through Cohen (see Tim Pool’s videos).  However, Vox’s Sean Illing has an interview of several experts on the potential legal consequences for Trump and relevance for impeachment.   But it is a no-brainer that Trump’s behavior with respect to the last-minute shutdown (and Ann Coulter) could be related to the impeachment threat – and that threatens national security, as Maddow argues.
  
Picture: Sign on Metro from Women’s march Saturday,

Sunday, January 20, 2019

What really happened with the MAGA-Catholic white kids and Nathan Phillips? The mainstream media jumped the gun, leading to false outrage


Here’s the best statement I can find on what really happened Saturday with the “MAGA” Covington (KY) Catholic kids and the Native American (Nathan Phillips), from Nick Gillespie on Reason (who was at the LibertyCon conference).

I questioned some Facebook posts from friends angry at the smirky privileged white kids and got vitriole myself today.  Several mainstream broadcasters condemned the kids online or in broadcasts. Later today, CNN began to admit there is a lot more context to the story. 


Tim Pool has a detailed video (above).  But he got a lot of wrath today if you look (as if he belonged on Fox News).  He says he is a center-Left Democrat but non-identarian. This sounds more like a Niskanen Center (as opposed to Cato) libertarian.  Pool, for example, maintains you do need “better” regulation to big banks and payment and media companies to prevent inhibition of competition or hidden ponzi schemes. For coverage of Trump's video on the shutdown, see TV blog Saturday. 

The mirror of the entire incident (1:46) is here on YouTube. 

Update: Jan. 21 

CNN offers a detailed interview with Nathan Phillips.  It's fair to say that some of Nathan's early remarks about the incident were very alarmist (in what he says he felt); in time he seemed to tone this down. However MSN reports that now Phillips stands by his original claim of disrespect from the boys. 


The Hill offers an op-ed saying it is only a matter of time before the social justice mob comes for you.  The tone of the article suggests that Section 230 shouldn't immunize platforms from reputational harm that comes from mob incitement from false reporting.


Update: Jan 23

Nick Sandmann's interview on Today show. 

Friday, January 18, 2019

Does the Buzzfeed story on new evidence against Trump and Cohen affect the shutdown? Probably, and don't make any airline reservations for a while



OK:  Maybe this is spreading rumors, but here is the Buzzfeed story where Michael Cohen claims he was instructed to lie to Congress about his tower in Moscow. 

If actual evidence appears, then Trump apparently would be caught in the same position as Nixon with the tapes in 1974. The evidence would be texts or emails.

Then Trump cancels Pelosi’s use of military aircraft to fly to several overseas locations to visit troops.  When Pelosi et al make plans for commercial flights, the White House leaks it, causing grave security threats and Pelosi to cancel. 


The Washington Post is suggesting that it may take federal wildcat strikes, as by the TSA, to end this standoff – shut down all of air travel.  Some activists want to shut down the Internet or the financial system.  NBC's Chuck Todd has made similar suggestions. 

Don't make any airlines reservations until this is all settled (which could mean impeachment). 

But there are stories that it takes only four more GOP senators to override a veto. 
    
The Overton Window shifts.

Update: Jan 19

Mueller's office has disputed that there is any evidence of the Buzzfeed report (Washington Post);  other major and indie news sources follow with questions, especially Smerconish on Sat. AM. 

Thursday, January 17, 2019

College admissions consultant point out that David Hogg's narrative demonstrates how opportunity does come from being close to a tragedy



SuperTutorTV gives us a pep talk about David Hogg’s admission to Harvard with a 1270 SAT.

  
I checked Wikipedia, and Hogg’s score would actually place him at about the 87th percentile. That isn’t bad.  Maybe Jack Andraka (Stanford, now finishing a peer-reviewed Honor’s paper after summer in Sierra Leone as a Truman scholar) was at the 100th percentile.  But of course, Hogg demonstrated enormous people skills and street smarts (given all the ableism and “white privilege” notwithstanding) able to organizae a movement, and an expressed  interest in running for office as early in adulthood as possible and fixing our broken systems.

It’s interesting, in fact, that David’s book ("#NeverAgain") indicates a history of dyslexia (even requiring special education at one point) which cleared when he reached puberty (this is something that often happens, pediatricians know about this well).  He developed technical skill in photography and video editing (he has enough skill to work in Hollywood now as a film editor) on his own and made impressive videos well before Parkland. He also showed unusual compassion and willingness to intervene in situations, as with an incident involving bullying by a lifeguard of another kid on a California beach the summer before Parkland.

All of this obviously makes one an interesting candidate for admissions.
  
But SuperTutorTV is pointing out the irony of opportunities in life.  Often an unexpected incident, even hardship, which has to be overcome, and which provides some radical insight in how one can attack some fundamental problem in an original way, provides unusual opportunity.

Wednesday, January 16, 2019

Rep. Steve King may really have intended to refer only to "western civilization" with his unfortunate pronoun




Rep. King, under severe censure in the House of Representatives, tweeted today that he intended only “Western Civilization” to be referred to later by his pronoun “that”, as if the dash in the sentence preceded it directed.  As a factual matter, we have to give him the “benefit of the doubt” on what that statement meant. English grammar is not as precise as romance languages on using endings to show where modifiers point.  This is a Language Focus problem (watch “Paul” on YouTube).

Of course, if you are like Umair Haque, you'll go down the path of equating western civilization to "predatory capitalism." 

It’s true that the other items in the sentence (like “white supremacy”) simply had no traction at all in public discourse until after Charlottesville in August 2017.  Now, every statement and every association gets parsed for possible connection to the idea that someday slavery and segregation could really come back.  All because of one incident from a relatively small number of extremists. But it also true that the intersectional Left has focused excessively on symbols (like the monuments) or group oppression rather than on actual policy.  

The New York Times, however, offers a long list of King’s past offensive statements.  One or more of them appear to refer to demographic winter and the idea that non-white populations seem to have more children.  That may be true sometimes (especially with immigration from the southern border) but not always.  Some Asian populations (Japan) have low birth rates, and China is recovering from its one-child policy.  It all depend on the specifics.


Other statements would offend many people, especially on the political Left, and may be homophobic too, but they don’t actually call for an ethno-state. 

We seem to have a very slippery slope and it is very easy for anyone to get smeared by apparent distant connections to the worst of the alt-right.   Look at what happened to Milo.

One question on the shutdown:  isn’t it possible to transfer the Coast Guard temporarily to the Navy so that sailors can be paid?
  
I still find it alarming that the President, and the leaders of House and Senate, for differing political purposes, will withhold pay of some workers and sailors and keep them working in involuntary servitude. There should be litigation to stop this.



Update: Later Wednesday

Various media outlets report a lawsuit by African-American employees against GM at the Toledo, Ohio plant as a result of harassment (even nooses) from a few employees that the company did not stop. The Union plays down the issue.  

Sunday, January 13, 2019

Partisanship denies Congress the scientific and I.T. talent it definitely needs



Bill Pascell, Jr. in The Washington Post asks “Why is Congress so dumb?” in a lengthy piece in the Outlook section Sunday. 

The short answer is that Congress has reduced staffs and become vulnerable to letting paid lobbyists do their thinking for them. 

But a better answer is that politics isn’t attracting people with brains.  It could be that David Hogg’s idea that “the young people will win” will change things.  Alexandria Octavia-Cortez has not yet impressed anyone with logical thinking about how to pay for everything (other than a radically more progressive income tax, which could make sense).  But I have a feeling that if Hogg got into Congress at 26 (in 2026) this would change.

  
We can ask why we if we really need to attract scientists into Congress.  Think about climate change, the power grids.  Congress definitely needs access to brains:  the Andraka brothers for pollution control and cancer research;  Taylor Wilson for border security (literally), especially WMD's;  and the math whiz kids (there are several) at UCLA's Art of Problem Solving for putting together health care reform that actuaries can make work. And talent like this is turned off by politics. 
  
 And I think Mark Zuckerberg, yes, would really like to fix Facebook.  But he didn't see what happened in 2016 coming. No one did.  Here's another one. 
  
 Should journalists be in office?  Anderson Cooper or Chris Cuomo could certainly bring brains to Congress or even the presidency. But so did Obama. 

Saturday, January 12, 2019

Debt ceiling returns March 2, could become serious if shutdown continues



Recently there has been mention of the possibility that a continued federal shutdown could lead to a default on debt and a failure to handle the debt ceiling issue.

According to “The Hill”, Congress had previously agreed to suspend the debt ceiling until March 2, 2019, when it goes back into effect. 

The Treasury could be in real danger of defaulting on some obligations by early summer 2019.

  
There have been several posts on this blog in the past (especially in the summer of 2011 and then in early 2013) about how paid prioritization could work, and whether Social Security payments would be affected (probably not), but it isn’t pretty reading. I did jump the gun on Trump's declaring a national emergency.
    
He waffled, and that may be a sign that some sort of compromise early next week is possible.  

Peggy Noonan argues in the WSJ Saturday, "End this stupid shutdown."

Julian Zelizer, a Princeton professor, argues that Mitch McConnell is the logjam.  The post was updated late Saturday and I'm not sure I follow it.



Update: Jan. 13

Dov Weinwyrb Grohsgal explains  in the Washington Post how Trump could use the pocket veto to let the government reopne without his signature on a bill without the Wall spending he wants.

Update: Jan. 31

This morning CNN mentioned that the president could block raising the debt ceiling in lieu of an emergency declaration later on if he doesn't "get what he wants" in the new negotiations and after another shutdown occurs. 

Thursday, January 10, 2019

Trump will invoked a state of emergency to build wall (that seems like 99% certain now). Maybe it does get people back to work. (Oops - the 1% happens)



With a spectacle approaching of massed missed paychecks tomorrow for federal workers, Sen Lindsey Graham (R-SC) is calling on for Trump to declare his national emergency and enumerate the powers he wants to use, to build his wall.

Then the government could be reopened.


Graham was despondent about the lack of progress today even among some senior Republicans on coming up with a compromise that Trump could sign.

There are many opinions about how court challenges would go.  It would appear legal for Trump to use surplus Corp of Engineer funds and contractors (it’s less clear that he can legally use military personnel).  However, these fund would be removed from possible use in disaster relief, like wildfires, earthquakes and hurricanes.  In fact, it seems to come from money already intended to help with Puerto Rico (Maria) and also the after effects of hurricanes like Harvey and Florence. 
  
The enumeration of specific powers could get dangerous if Trump went beyond the immediate issue of the border and got into other areas, like the Internet.  Some of my concern comes from the idea that “asymmetry” is itself a national security problem (following the logic of Taleb’s “skin in the game”).  But as long as Trump can stay away from this particular area (which I blab about a lot) I hope Democrats will leave the wall alone and let employees come back to work. True.
  
 Trump made this mess. He had promised to cooperate and then caved in to pseudo president Ann Coulter (Kyle Schmidlin on Medium).   



Update: Jan. 11

Trump said late Friday that he would not call an emergency right now. (The 1% probability happened.) He fears he would lose in court. And even with the Senate away for the weekend, Mitch McConnell hinted this after noon he would get talks going behind the scenes. 

The Wall Street Journal today, in an op-ed by Dan Crenshall, "The Silly Arguments Against a Border Wall", argues that the Democrats need to be more flexible on this. 

Wednesday, January 09, 2019

Trump throws a tantrum, acts like a mob boss from "The Town" in meeting with Dem's; "Give me what I want and I'll go away"



From the confrontation today. “Schumer: Why won’t you open the government and stop hurting people?  :Trump: Because then you won’t give me what I want.”

I’m reminded of the movie “The Town” (going out and hurting some people), and “Storm of the Century” (“Give me what I want and I’ll go away”.)

Is Trump the mob boss on this one?

It seems that Trump is in control right now, and the Democrats haven’t said why they have such an absolute objection to any more Wall, except for partisanship.


Note how Trump ends this video.  You have to hurt people to get things done, just like in the mob world.

This leads to grave moral traps for individuals, who may not get caught in this one, but maybe the next one.  How you deal with coercion is a moral issue.

Here’s a Coast Guard tip sheet, taken down, that is as shameful as the OPM’s.  Make everyone become a doomsday prepper or a prole.

Monday, January 07, 2019

Trump to address the nation apparently "only" on southern border crisis, after public appeals on Twitter for both sides to deal now


Today I answered two of Donald Trump’s tweets.  I challenged him along with Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer to strike a deal at $3 billion, stop holding workers hostage, and stop the partisanship. Here it is

Then when Trump tweeted that he will address the Nation Tuesday night at 9 PM, I replied.   

I am mystified by Democrat refusal to deal at all on the Wall issue, which could be needed in some locations.  

Note that Trump said he would address the nation on the humanitarian and national security crisis on the southern border.  Presumably his words, taken literally, mean he is concerned only about the southern border, and not other threats that are likely much more really dangerous to the US.  Trump’s announced intention to visit the southern border Thursday supports this notion.  Peter Bergen’s link to the history of real threats (from various other foreign sources, especially radical Islam and probably North Korea) is relevant.


But also cybersecurity, along with certain other technological threats (EMP) really could pose a national security emergency.   The asymmetric effect  (as in Nicholas Taleb’s “Skin in the Game”) of a lot of spontaneous Internet speech when read overseas is quite unpredictable and could conceivably justify Chinese-style clampdowns here. I talked about this Saturday on my “Books blog” review of an Atlantic article (q.v.).
   
Wall Street didn't act worried today, but it might not have digested the news or thought this deeply into the implications. 

Saturday, January 05, 2019

Trump's government shut-down sounds more dangerous than previous ones, because he is able to throw "the elites" under the bus, almost like a Bolshevik in 1917




The most disturbing part of President Donald Trump’s outdoor press conference Friday afternoon is his willingness to sacrifice the normally legitimate interests of others (right now some federal workers and especially contractors) to please his “aggrieved” base. The Washington Post has a sobering piece by Damian Paletta and Erica Werner. 

He made the hyperbolic threat that the shutdown could go “months” or “years”.  OK, here is Vox’s take on it (by Li Zhou)  While you’re at it, check Vox’s supplementary story about how to prevent future shutdowns.
  
And OPM last weekend had the temerity to suggest to federal workers to become “proles” and offer their barter manual labor to landlords, right out of Karl Marx.  I wrote about this on Wordpress.  That shows he is willing to force the “privileged” to experience subservience and sacrifice for his idea of a supposed public good. 

I do agree, as I wrote on the International Issue blog last night, that a Wall or translucent fence in some areas is necessary. Democrats on the far Left must stop screaming “That’s not what we stand for”.

And if you want to talk about sacrifice (remember how Perot talked about “shared sacrifice” in 1992), yes, when someone in the US (like the policeman in LA) is murdered by an illegal immigrant that person is a sacrifice, not just a victim. That would go for MS-13.  And, yes, a trojan horse threat at the border is possible.  It’s also true that in the aggregate, immigrants (even when illegal) have lower violent crime rates than native born Americans. But it still can be said that a crime committed by someone here illegally is a crime that could have been prevented.

Other Americans have to look for more disruption than expected.  TSA agents call in sick.  Amtrak seems OK for now, but may not be forever. 
  
So, let’s hope that Mike Pence reaches for his Christian faith and comes up with a way out of this.  Senate and House Republicans could support a veto (2/3 vote) but would only do so if Democrats give in somewhat on "The Wall". 

Should ordinary Americans be expected to use crowdfunding to support the affected workers?  I indirectly addressed this on my main blog Thursday.  If someone starts one, how do you know it is valid?
  
There is a way where my trust could become involved, by declaring a federal worker or contractor “special needs” through one of three beneficiary non-profits.  I can’t go into details here, but this can affect me if this goes on a long time.
   
 There are reports on CNN Saturday that federal employee unions will file suit this weekend to get paid, claiming FLSA violations. 
  
  Can Trump reasonably get the Wall built under national emergency provisions (even if local)?  If Trump could do this, could he shut down social media as a national security threat?  Maybe that sounds improbable because that's how he got elected, but don't count on it.   NBC News has a discussion of the emergency powers, with a link to an Atlantic article about implications for the Internet.  The New York Times has a counter op-ed by Bruce Ackerman, here.
    
 A lot is said about the influence of Ann Coulter, who, amazingly, suddenly supported extreme income and wealth taxes on the rich, as if she really wants an ethno-socialist state? 

Friday, January 04, 2019

California law limits pet shops to rescued animals



I do expect to get to the subject of the shutdown and Wall soon – it isn’t clear enough yet – but I’ll take a moment tonight to note California’s new law preventing pet stores from getting animals (usually dogs and cats) from puppy mills.

Pets can be bred and sold to individuals or families without going through stores.  But this would seem to limit the commercial volume pet business. 


But the state wants consumers to look at animal shelters first.

The law is viewed as an expansion of animal rights, or the recognition that higher mammals like carnivores have much more self-awareness than the law has given them credit for.

You have to have some smarts and problem solving ability, predictive of primates and humans, to hunt for a living. And it takes some smarts for an animal to build a relationship with a being of another species – us.   And we keep seeing stories on YouTube of larger wild cats, like bobcats, remembering humans that they have interacted with. 
  
What happens when we turn attention to whales and dolphins?

Tuesday, January 01, 2019

Bre Payton's death: yes, flu can still kill young people; unfortunate comments on Twitter follow



The sudden death of Federalist columnist Bre Payton should give us all cause for sober reflection.  Here is a memoir by colleague David Marcus. 

It is possible even today for someone young and healthy to die suddenly of infections disease. Apparently she had H1N1 influenza and somehow it led to encephalitis. We don’t know for sure whether she had taken the vaccine.


Young adults going to live in dorm arrangements should be wary of bacterial meningitis, especially Type B, for which there is a new vaccine.  That’s a germ that has been responsible for quadruple amputations.

People going overseas to volunteer need more shots than they get – including Ebola in more areas.
I did live through the AIDS epidemic in the 1980s.  During the earliest years, some people went from being strong and healthy do wasting and dying in less than a year.
  
Unfortunately there has been some mean rhetoric about Bre on Twitter because she wrote for a “conservative” paper.  Simply unbelievable. Crass tweets can come back years later to drive you out of a job.  I actually shared the backlash that showed up on my phone with a couple friends on the Metro last night coming back.